Thursday, 29 August 2013

Boycott tops 2,500 signatures Juliet Stevenson gets on board

Boycott tops 2,500 signatures

Juliet Stevenson gets on board

Juliet Stevenson

More than 2,500 people and groups have now signed up to our boycott of Intercontinental hotels.

Our campaign was given another boost when actress Juliet Stevenson (right), whose credits include Truly, Madly, Deeply,Bend It Like Beckham and many other stage and screen productions, joined the boycott.

Juliet, a long-time supporter of Tibetan freedom said: "I was deeply shocked to hear how abuses in Tibet will be exacerbated by the Intercontinental hotel in Lhasa.

"I am happy to support Free Tibet's boycott of Intercontinental."

Take action


Despite the ongoing injustice, repression and torture in Tibet, Intercontinental Hotels Group is naming its luxury hotel, the “Lhasa Paradise”. This gifts priceless PR to the occupying Chinese regime.


If you've already joined the boycott, forward this email to your friends and ask them to get on board.

 .

Wednesday, 28 August 2013

Fonterra resumes operations in Sri Lanka

 — New Zealand diary giant Fonterra said Wednesday that it has resumed operations in Sri Lanka after temporarily closing its plant out of concern for the safety of its staff.

Operations in Colombo were temporarily halted to ensure the safety of about 755 employees after members and supporters of a government-allied political party held a protest near Fonterra's office, accusing the company of selling tainted milk.

I am now confident that our people are safe and the business is ready to resume operations and continue selling high quality dairy nutrition to Sri Lankan people," said Fonterra Chief Executive Theo Spierings in a statement posted on the company's web site.

Fonterra recalled infant formula earlier this month after announcing it discovered the presence of botulism bacteria in some of its products. The company has since retested the product and found it free of the bacteria.

Two weeks ago, a nurses' trade union won a court order forcing Fonterra to suspend sales and advertising of its products after Sri Lanka's Health Ministry said tests showed that some imported Fonterra milk products contained traces of the agricultural chemical dicyandiamide.

Health authorities asked Fonterra to recall the tainted batches from the market. The company says it complied.

The court lifted the suspension Friday.

We Must Measure the Consequences of Intervening in Syria Posted: 29/08/2013 00:00

We are all angry and upset at the terrible pictures of the atrocity in Syria. Poison gas is a cowardly and inhumane weapon. Its use against civilians is especially despicable. Instinctively we all want to punish the perpetrators and ensure there will be no repeat of this mass slaughter.

That's the emotional reaction. The rational one is to measure the consequences of our using force in the Syrian Civil War. Force begets more force. A civil war with evil fanatics on both sides could quickly escalate into a regional war and a world war. There are many interests involved including the Al Nusra branch of Al Qaeda on the insurgents side, the divided rule of President Assad and his brother plus the nations of Iran, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Israel, China and the neighbouring Arab states.

No one can predict with certainty the consequences of the use of force by the UK or the US. Hague repeats that the UK should punch above our weight. That means spending above our interests and dying beyond our responsibilities. Not since the Vietnam War has the UK behaved as an independent state. Harold Wilson avoided involvement in that futile war. Parliament should reach our own national decision and not again act as an appendage of the United States.

An attack by US/UK on Damascus should be named the war of Obama's blushes. Foolishly he drew a red line. It's been crossed and he retaliates with bombs to avoid accusations of weakness. That's his problem not ours.

Tony Blair has blundered into the debate with one of the signature war-cries of the Peace Envoy. What is required from him now is a prolonged period of silence and invisibility. The delayed Chilcot Report will prove his folly.

In 2003 Blair rallied the Commons with rhetoric and fear. 139 Labour MPs defied a three line whip. All are grateful that they did. About 50 Labour MPs were bullied, bribed or bamboozled into abstaining or voting for war. Most bitterly regret their vote. In 2006 when only two UK soldiers had been killed in combat in Afghanistan we invaded Helmand in the hope that not a shot would be fired. Now the death toll is 440.

These are indelible memories for MPs. Trust in official reassurances has gone. This time all MPs will be circumspect before they throw petrol on a new inferno.

There is another invisible pressure for perpetual war. Staggering evidence has emerged of the reach of the tentacles of the US Defense contractors. The disgraced General Petraeus, when he was the top US commander in Afghanistan, allowed lobbyists Frederick and Kimberly Kagan unique access to secret information and private meetings. The married couple used these privileges to advocate substantive changes in the US war plan. The Kagans repeatedly campaigned against peace initiatives to serve the commercial interests of their paymasters. Although they were always at the elbow of Petraeus, they were not paid by the Government or the Military. Their income came from the US Defense contractors. This is lobbying at its most pernicious. Petraeus allowed the Kagans to help draft his reports to the US government. The resultant decisions lengthened the conflict and increased the total of NATO and Afghan casualties killed.

Capitalising on a surge of emotion to write your page in history is a frequent political stunt. All premiers get turned on when war beckons. They adopt a Napoleonic posture, polish up the Churchillian rhetoric and strut in the Commons as the saviours of the world.

The result of recent PM decisions in Iraq and Helmand is the loss of 623 UK soldiers lives. Hell of a price to pay for prime ministerial vanity.

Cheryl Gillan, Ex-Cabinet Minister, Warns Syria Attack Could Be An 'Absolute Disaster

One of David Cameron's former cabinet colleagues has warned his move to launch military strikes against Syria could lead to "absolute disaster".

Speaking to The Huffington Post UK on Wednesday on the eve of a high-stakes Commons vote that would authorise retaliation against the Assad regime for the alleged use of chemical weapons, Cheryl Gillan said she would did not want to repeat the mistake of Iraq and was "suspicious" of the case for war.

Gillan served as Cameron's Welsh secretary until September 2012 when she lost her job in government at the reshuffle.

"I voted for the Iraq war after I listened to Tony Blair, he turned out to be leading us all up the garden path. I don't want to do that again," she said.

"I very much worry we haven't got the provenance on these chemical attacks. I am just horrified as anyone. I just feel the helplessness of anyone being attacked by chemical weapons. I don't want to diminish that, but we have to make sure who launched that attack and why."

Gillan added: "What will be the unintended consequences? What will be the diplomatic consequences? What will be the fall out as far as other countries are concerned? I'm worried we are embarking on a line which could lead to absolute disaster."

On Tuesday Cameron announced he was recalling parliament on Thursday to give MPs a debate and vote on any action as he had previously promised to do. The fact parliament was due to return on Monday anyway has increased suspicions the UK and US intend to launch strikes before the end of this week.

"There are too many unknown quantities," Gillan said. "I am worried because parliament has been recalled two days before it was due to come back anyway. This indicates to me the Americans have already committed and we are getting in their as fast as possible to support our allies.

"If you were thinking about it from the prime minister's perspective; if he's given some sort of commitment to the Americans … he had also promised that parliament would have a vote on it, he would want to sticks to his word.

Asked if her view was shared by other Conservative MPs, the veteran Chesham and Amersham MP, who served as a shadow Foreign Office minister when William Hague was Tory leader, said:"I don't think mine will be very different to many of my colleagues."

A significant number of backbench Conservative MPs have frequently expressed deep concern about any move to intervene militarily in Syria - and the prime minister is unlikely to be able to rely on all his MPs to support him in tomorrow's vote.

Earlier this year 81 Tories signed a letter to Downing Street demanding they be given the right to veto any military action.

Gillan said failing to have a proper Commons debate and vote would have looked "very bad particularly in the light of what happened in Iraq".

She also pointed out that the Chilcot Inquiry, which is examining the run-up to the 2003 invasion, has still not reported back.

"We don't even have the final position into Iraq," she said. "Call me cynical but whenTony Blair came out in support [of intervention in Syria] I started to have another look at it."

Gillan said she had been "utterly convinced" by Blair's arguments in favour of the Iraq War at the time and put aside party politics believing a "British prime minister would never ever let us have the opportunity to launch military action without it being based on sure foundations."

She added: "I'm older and wiser now, I'm a lot more suspicious."

On Tuesday a YouGov poll for The Sun showed 50% of Britons oppose attacking Assad's regime with long range missiles from ships, while just a quarter are in favour of it.

Gillan said the legacy of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were partially responsible for voters' caution.

"I think people in the country have instincts. And I think the instincts of the British people at the moment are really cautious and not to intervene," she said. "I think Iraq and Afghanistan have blunted the appetite for the UK to be the policeman of the world. And I think peoples instinct is still super cautious towards any intervention directly by the UK."

Cameron announced this morning that Britain will put a resolution to the United Nations Security Council later on Wednesday "authorising necessary measures to protect civilians" in Syria. The prime minister announced the move on his Twitter feed on Wednesday morning. "We've always said we want the UN Security Council to live up to its responsibilities on Syria. Today they have an opportunity to do that," he said. The resolution is highly unlikely to pass as Russia and China will block it.


Update from BIHR: sign the ECHR birthday card and join us on Tour

Dear colleague,

 

You signed up to attend the BIHR open course on Healthcare and Human Rights in February. I wanted to let you know about a couple of other BIHR free events / activities you could get involved in. I’d also be really grateful if you could share these with your colleagues and contacts.

 

60th anniversary of ECHR

 

The 3 September 2013 marks the 60th anniversary of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) coming into force. At BIHR we think this is something to celebrate.

 

We are co-ordinating a Birthday Card to the ECHR, which is attached. The Birthday Card is open for signature from individuals and organisations (or both!). We will be delivering the Birthday Card to the Council of Europe. The birthday card will be open for signature until Monday 2nd at midday. To sign, just reply to this email, or see the ‘ECHR at 60’ page of our website where you will also find a selection of special 60th anniversary resources and other exciting activities we have planned.

 

 

Human Rights Tour visits Wolverhampton!

 

BIHR is hosting a series of free-to-attend events on human rights as part of our annual Human Rights Tour. BIHR will be visiting 17 towns and cities across the UK, hosting events in partnership with a range of voluntary and public sector partners. Each event will explore why you need human rights and why human rights need you (including an update on the current political debates on human rights in the UK).

 

The Tour will visit Wolverhampton on 18 September. It would be great to see you there. For more information (including other dates and locations) and to book your place, please visit our website http://www.bihr.org.uk/events/the-human-rights-tour-2013-4

 

I hope to see you there!

 

Many thanks and best wishes,

Helen

 

****************

Helen Wildbore

Human Rights Officer

British Institute of Human Rights

School of Law

Queen Mary, University of London 

Mile End Road

London, E1 4NS

Direct line:  0207 882 5851

Main:  0207 882 5850

 


Not the right sort of guide in Sri Lanka


Not the right sort of guide in Sri Lanka

There is a problem with unlicensed tour guides in Sri Lanka. – Photo from The Island

There is a problem with unlicensed tour guides in Sri Lanka. – Photo from The Islan

Sri Lanka must quickly resolve its tour guide issues, as the country’s tourism industry grows.

VETERAN tour guide lecturer Joe Livera, who is also the incumbent president of the Sri Lanka Institute of National Tour Guide Lecturers (SLINGL), discusses the many facets of the tour guide industry and issues faced by tour guide lecturers.

Some of the issues are not only detrimental to the guide lecturers alone, but the industry at large. They have to be resolved as soon as possible as the country is heading for a new era in tourism with more demands.

There has been an increased number of unlicensed tour guides operating in the country. This trend, according to general prevailing notion within the industry, doesn’t augur well for tourism. How do the authorities find this situation and what action has been taken to arrest it?

The issue of unlicensed and unauthorised guides including the so-called "beach boys" had been there for a long period. The current fears of increasing trend seemed to be owing to the people realising that the numbers have grown to such a level that its further growth would definitely harm the industry to a great extent. The statistical records indicate that there are 400-500 persons who come under this category. But surely there are more and the number is on the increase.

There are instances of unlicensed and unauthorised guides cheating, duping and taking advantage of tourists. They are notorious for indiscipline and improper conduct. Many tourists have complained of this situation. The authorities must do their own share in saving the industry by making it mandatory for tour guides to have a valid licence and that no person without it be allowed to operate as tour guides.

How would you describe the role of police in this situation?

(The) Police have no powers. Only an assistant director of the Tourism Development Authority has authority to make an arrest. The police could only escort such or higher-ranking officers. This is a loophole in the net of law. We think it's high time the laws be amended to give more powers to police so that they would act.

What about the foreign tour operators who don’t possess a licence but accompany tour groups?

According to regulations, no foreign tour operator is allowed to travel with a tour group without a local guide lecturer. Yet these regulations are overlooked by some travel agents. They do so for various reasons. We think that this has to be stopped.

There are many complaints against foreign tour operators. The age-old laws have given no power to law enforcement officers to arrest them. This again shows the need for amending the laws relevant to the industry.

What is your assessment of the Tourist Police? Do you think they do a proper job? Are they prepared to meet the demands of a burgeoning tourism industry?

The Tourist Police lack the required numbers and trained personnel to provide the services which are expected from them. There had been some gory incidents of tourists being harassed in the recent past. There were worse incidents.

But the Tourist Police is unable to give assurance that there would be no repetition of such unfortunate incidents. Touts continue to exploit tourists under the very eyes of police. Not that all officials are bad but the general perception about the Tourist Police in the industry is very low.

There had been narratives from victims that on many occasions, those who committed a crime or acted against tourists had been armed to their teeth and some even carried sophisticated guns. But the policemen standing nearby had not even a hand gun.

Political involvements have forced the police to not act during many occasions. Tourists do not come to see the antics of local politicians, but in some instances they have been compelled to do so as we do not have a strong Tourist Police.

The government, which has promised in many policy manifestos to make the country a top tourist destination in the world, should think about it.

The so called "Beach Boys" are also a part of our society. How could they be turned (into) more useful citizens?

We have conducted regular programmes, seminars and workshops to educate them. Some have to be rehabilitated. Those programmes have been quite successful. For example, most of these Beach Boys could speak several languages. For them to be successful, all they need is proper guidance.

There are complaints from national tour guide lecturers that certain travel agents are depriving them of their due commissions. There are complaints of guide lecturers being ill-treated. Are they true?

Yes, we have observed that some travel agents engaged in this practice. Some are well-organised. Some of them pay the commissions to companies but not to the guide lecturers.

There is a monopoly and it is on the increase. The travel agents designate the shops where the tourists should be taken and even the tourists have no choice and are forced (to) buy what they want from shops designated by the travel agents and the commission is sent to them, depriving the guides of their legitimate commissions.

Some hotels don’t provide rooms to guide lecturers like in the past and they are forced to seek accommodation elsewhere or guest houses designated by them.

There had been occasions where some hotels housed guide lecturers in places lesser in comfort and facilities than the accommodation facilities provided to the tourists. It is wrong. According to the guidelines and regulations laid down by the Sri Lanka Tourism Development Authority (SLTDA), a guide lecturer accompanying a group of seven should be provided accommodation in the same hotel. The regulation has been made in view of the fact that most of the tourists feel at home and secure with a guide lecturer being around.

We have taken up these issues with the SLTDA. Its chairman Bhaswara Gunaratne has pledged to address the issues. – The Island, Sri Lanka/Asia .

Tuesday, 27 August 2013

Garden Court Chambers - Immigration Law Bulletin

Garden Court Chambers - Immigration Law Bulletin - Issue 338

Ignaoua, R (Application of) v SSHD [2013] EWHC 2512 (Admin)

It is the clear Parliamentary intention of s.15 of the Justice and Security Act 2013, that where a person has been excluded from the United Kingdom on grounds of the public good, in reliance on information which in the Secretary of State's opinion should not be made public for national security or similar reasons, a challenge to the exclusion direction must be advanced in the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) if the Secretary of State has certified the direction. Therefore, as SIAC is the only avenue for such challenges, the Secretary of State can certify exclusion directions made before commencement of the legislation and can terminate existing judicial review proceedings in which these directions are being challenged.
For the full judgment, click here . . . .

C1 & Ors v SSHD (Rev 2) [2013] EWHC 2415 (Admin)
Anthony Thornton QC, sitting as a deputy High Court Judge, held that a refusal by the Secretary of State for the Home Department to accept the claimant mother and daughter's resettlement in the United Kingdom as mandate refugees was unlawful and perverse. The Secretary of State had misapplied her mandate refugee policy by taking into account irrelevant considerations and failing to take into account relevant considerations. There was a lack of reasoning in her decision and it was neither structured nor compliant with the policy.
For the full judgment, click here . . . .